SECTION 01WIKIPEDIA SERVICES

The right Wikipedia strategy starts before the article.

Whether you're considering Wikipedia for the first time, improving an existing article, or looking for ongoing support, WikiFortress helps you understand the evidence, navigate the editorial process and determine the right path forward.

01MEDIA
02PUBLICATIONS
03INTERVIEWS
04RESEARCH
05INDEPENDENT SOURCES
EVIDENCE
STRATEGY
ARTICLE

WE DON'T START BY WRITING. WE START BY UNDERSTANDING.

SECTION 02WHY OUR SERVICES ARE DIFFERENT

Wikipedia is not one service.

Every Wikipedia project starts from a different position.

Some people have strong independent coverage but don't know how to approach the process.

Others already have an article that needs improvement.

Some have achieved significant recognition but aren't sure whether that recognition is documented in the sources Wikipedia requires.

And sometimes, the right answer is simply: Not yet.

That's why we don't begin with a template. We begin by understanding your situation, your evidence and the editorial considerations surrounding it.

From there, we determine the most appropriate path forward.

SECTION 03WIKIPEDIA ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT

Find out where you actually stand.

Not sure whether you qualify for Wikipedia?

Before investing time and resources into an article, our team can assess the strength of your existing public profile and the evidence surrounding it.

We examine the available independent coverage, source quality, depth of coverage and other relevant factors to help determine whether pursuing Wikipedia makes sense.

Find Out Where You Stand →
WIKIFORTRESSPROFILE
ASSESSMENT
ILLUSTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
01Independent Coverage

Who is writing about you, and are those sources independent of you or your organisation?

STRONGMIXEDLIMITED
02Source Quality

Are the available sources reliable and editorially useful?

STRONGMIXEDLIMITED
03Depth of Coverage

Do credible sources discuss your work substantially, or simply mention you?

STRONGMIXEDLIMITED
04Public Significance

Is there documented significance beyond your own promotional material?

STRONGMIXEDLIMITED
PROCEED.STRENGTHEN YOUR PROFILE FIRST.OR WAIT.

The goal is not to force a decision. It's to give you a clearer one.

SECTION 04WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE DEVELOPMENT

Turn documented significance into a properly researched article.

When the evidence supports moving forward, our editorial team develops the article around reliable, independent sources and Wikipedia's standards for neutral, encyclopedic writing.

The objective isn't to make a profile sound impressive.

It's to accurately document what reputable sources have already established.

STEP 01

Research

Identify and review relevant sources.

STEP 02

Source Development

Organise supporting references and connect claims to appropriate sources.

STEP 03

Editorial Drafting

Develop neutral, encyclopedic content.

STEP 04

Structure

Organise the article and supporting information appropriately.

STEP 05

Review

Conduct internal editorial review.

STEP 06

Submission Support

Assist with the appropriate next stage of the editorial process.

Discuss Your Article →
SECTION 05WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE IMPROVEMENT

Your existing article may not tell the full story.

An existing Wikipedia article isn't necessarily a finished article.

It may contain outdated information, weak sourcing, structural problems, missing context or coverage that no longer reflects the subject accurately.

WikiFortress can review an existing article and identify areas where improvements may be appropriate.

Review My Existing Article →
EXISTING ARTICLE
Outdated information
Weak sourcing
Missing context
Structural issues
EDITORIALREVIEW
AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT
Structure+

Improve how information is organised and presented.

Citations+

Identify areas where stronger supporting sources may be needed.

Factual Updates+

Bring appropriate information up to date where reliable documentation supports the change.

Coverage+

Identify significant areas that may be missing from the article.

SECTION 06WIKIPEDIA MONITORING & MAINTENANCE

An article doesn't stop evolving when it goes live.

Wikipedia is an open, collaborative encyclopedia. Articles can change over time.

Information becomes outdated. Editors make additions and revisions. New developments may need to be incorporated.

Our monitoring and maintenance support helps clients keep track of meaningful changes and identify areas that may require attention.

WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE
01NEW SOURCE
02EDITORIAL CHANGE
03NEW DEVELOPMENT
04CITATION
05UPDATE
01

Article Monitoring

Track meaningful changes to the page.

02

Factual Updates

Identify information that may require updating when reliable sources support the change.

03

Citation Maintenance

Review references as the article develops.

04

Editorial Review

Assess significant changes and potential issues.

05

Ongoing Support

Provide continued assistance where appropriate.

Discuss Ongoing Support →
SECTION 07WIKIPEDIA STRATEGY & ADVISORY

Sometimes the smartest move is not to publish yet.

Wikipedia should not be approached simply because someone wants a page.

The better question is: Does the available evidence support one?

Our advisory service is designed for people who want a strategic understanding of their position before committing to an article project.

  • What evidence do I currently have?
  • Where is the strongest independent coverage?
  • Where are the gaps?
  • What potential challenges should I consider?
  • Does it make sense to proceed now?
  • What should happen before pursuing Wikipedia?
Speak With an Advisor →
WIKIFORTRESS DECISION FRAMEWORK
SHOULD YOU PURSUE WIKIPEDIA?
STRONG INDEPENDENT COVERAGE?
YESNO
SUBSTANTIAL COVERAGE?
YESNO
APPROPRIATE EVIDENCE?
YESNO
PROCEEDSTRENGTHENASSESS FURTHERWAIT
This is a WikiFortress decision framework, not an official Wikipedia eligibility calculator.
SECTION 09THE WIKIFORTRESS PRINCIPLE

Evidence first.
Everything else follows.

01EVIDENCE
02ASSESSMENT
03STRATEGY
04EDITORIAL
05OUTCOME

Our approach begins with research rather than promotional copy.

We look at the evidence. We assess the sources. We identify strengths and limitations.

Then we determine the most appropriate path forward.

Because the goal isn't simply to create an article. The goal is to understand whether the evidence supports one, and if it does, how to approach it responsibly.

NOT SURE WHICH PATH IS RIGHT FOR YOU?

Start with clarity.

Tell us where you are today. We'll help you understand what the evidence says, what your options are and what the next step could look like.

FIND OUT WHERE I STAND →NO ASSUMPTIONS. NO GUARANTEES. JUST A CLEARER PICTURE OF THE ROAD AHEAD.