Who is writing about you, and are those sources independent of you or your organisation?
The right Wikipedia strategy starts before the article.
Whether you're considering Wikipedia for the first time, improving an existing article, or looking for ongoing support, WikiFortress helps you understand the evidence, navigate the editorial process and determine the right path forward.
WE DON'T START BY WRITING. WE START BY UNDERSTANDING.
Wikipedia is not one service.
Every Wikipedia project starts from a different position.
Some people have strong independent coverage but don't know how to approach the process.
Others already have an article that needs improvement.
Some have achieved significant recognition but aren't sure whether that recognition is documented in the sources Wikipedia requires.
And sometimes, the right answer is simply: Not yet.
That's why we don't begin with a template. We begin by understanding your situation, your evidence and the editorial considerations surrounding it.
From there, we determine the most appropriate path forward.
Find out where you actually stand.
Not sure whether you qualify for Wikipedia?
Before investing time and resources into an article, our team can assess the strength of your existing public profile and the evidence surrounding it.
We examine the available independent coverage, source quality, depth of coverage and other relevant factors to help determine whether pursuing Wikipedia makes sense.
ASSESSMENTILLUSTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
Are the available sources reliable and editorially useful?
Do credible sources discuss your work substantially, or simply mention you?
Is there documented significance beyond your own promotional material?
The goal is not to force a decision. It's to give you a clearer one.
Turn documented significance into a properly researched article.
When the evidence supports moving forward, our editorial team develops the article around reliable, independent sources and Wikipedia's standards for neutral, encyclopedic writing.
The objective isn't to make a profile sound impressive.
It's to accurately document what reputable sources have already established.
Research
Identify and review relevant sources.
Source Development
Organise supporting references and connect claims to appropriate sources.
Editorial Drafting
Develop neutral, encyclopedic content.
Structure
Organise the article and supporting information appropriately.
Review
Conduct internal editorial review.
Submission Support
Assist with the appropriate next stage of the editorial process.
Your existing article may not tell the full story.
An existing Wikipedia article isn't necessarily a finished article.
It may contain outdated information, weak sourcing, structural problems, missing context or coverage that no longer reflects the subject accurately.
WikiFortress can review an existing article and identify areas where improvements may be appropriate.
Structure+
Improve how information is organised and presented.
Citations+
Identify areas where stronger supporting sources may be needed.
Factual Updates+
Bring appropriate information up to date where reliable documentation supports the change.
Coverage+
Identify significant areas that may be missing from the article.
An article doesn't stop evolving when it goes live.
Wikipedia is an open, collaborative encyclopedia. Articles can change over time.
Information becomes outdated. Editors make additions and revisions. New developments may need to be incorporated.
Our monitoring and maintenance support helps clients keep track of meaningful changes and identify areas that may require attention.
Article Monitoring
Track meaningful changes to the page.
Factual Updates
Identify information that may require updating when reliable sources support the change.
Citation Maintenance
Review references as the article develops.
Editorial Review
Assess significant changes and potential issues.
Ongoing Support
Provide continued assistance where appropriate.
Sometimes the smartest move is not to publish yet.
Wikipedia should not be approached simply because someone wants a page.
The better question is: Does the available evidence support one?
Our advisory service is designed for people who want a strategic understanding of their position before committing to an article project.
- What evidence do I currently have?
- Where is the strongest independent coverage?
- Where are the gaps?
- What potential challenges should I consider?
- Does it make sense to proceed now?
- What should happen before pursuing Wikipedia?
Start with your situation.
I'M NOT SURE IF I QUALIFY
You want to understand whether your existing evidence supports pursuing Wikipedia.
I'M READY TO EXPLORE AN ARTICLE
You have substantial independent coverage and want to explore article development.
I ALREADY HAVE AN ARTICLE
You want to review, improve or update an existing Wikipedia article.
I WANT ONGOING SUPPORT
You want help monitoring and maintaining your Wikipedia presence.
I NEED STRATEGIC ADVICE
You're not sure what the right move is and want an informed assessment first.
Evidence first.
Everything else follows.
Our approach begins with research rather than promotional copy.
We look at the evidence. We assess the sources. We identify strengths and limitations.
Then we determine the most appropriate path forward.
Because the goal isn't simply to create an article. The goal is to understand whether the evidence supports one, and if it does, how to approach it responsibly.
Start with clarity.
Tell us where you are today. We'll help you understand what the evidence says, what your options are and what the next step could look like.
FIND OUT WHERE I STAND →NO ASSUMPTIONS. NO GUARANTEES. JUST A CLEARER PICTURE OF THE ROAD AHEAD.